≡ Menu

One Camera for Photo and Video

Now you are planning your wedding it’s critical to consider your wedding video.  Doing the whole thing yourself might be a lot cheaper and although the technology is incredible when it comes to equipment as shown below, it is always better to find a professional to do the work if you need something really completely unique to keep as a memento. 

All professional wedding video Sydney based companies use state of the art equipment, the only thing that sets them apart is the standard of work that they do, and this usually is reflected by their qualifications and experience.  Your marriage video is going to be something that you will hold dear over time so it’s vital that the person doing the shooting has some good testimonials from prior clients. 

Wedding plans take time and so there is no real need to jump into getting a wedding videographer Sydney based company, take it slow and ensure that they are going to provide you with a brilliant production as a cherished memento.  If you decide that you are going to do the honeymoon and wedding video yourself, you may consider using the Canon EOS 5D as it is a great camera for both videos and footage. 

Given the amazing qualities that the Canon EOS 5D Mark II has, offering a full 21.1 megapixel and an HD movie capacity ; one has to ask the question, if this is the point where photographers and videographers will be doing the same job.  Thinking about it, having just one kit for 2 purposes should be the ‘it’ gadget.  Considering that you don’t have to carry heavy heaps of cameras, stands and lenses, having just one small camera should do the job.  But is it really up to it?  Are we actually into it? 

There is an interesting convergence taking place though that is being driven by the equipment makers.  Increasingly video capture is being found in all things from mobile telephones and PDAs to dig cams.  Also, the cost of near-broadcast quality video gear has dropped to the point that cameras and editing systems that were the dream of creative film makers just a short while back are now in reach of just about everybody. 

Taking an effective image means telling a story in a single image.  Through choice of subject, composition, focus, cropping and so on, the cameraman selects those things that he wants to convey the meaning intended, or not.  This is a demanding art as well as craft.  With film or video, motion pictures as they once were universally called, there is the added element of multiple perspectives achieved thru revising, as well as sound.  A mood can be created.  A complex story can cialis online be told.  The viewer’s perceptions and emotions can be manipulated to realize the creator’s educational or emotional ends.  But this is unusual, at least to the quality standard that we have set.  Most comparable productions require 2, or 3, or more people with specialised abilities to accomplish a similar thing. 

Nevertheless, even those among us with smaller experience and abilities can still find pleasure in producing short videos and still footage that can be creatively gratifying, and also even achieve wider recognition.  The point is that for some folks video production could be a extraordinarily satisfying accessory to still photography, if not an actual alternative.  And, with the new generation of high-definition equipment which has just become available this year at down to earth prices, the visible quality of what can be produced is just amazing. 

So, will this be the medium of the future?  What will this be called?  What will you call the person that’s both photographer and a videographer?  There is just so much difference that both mediums are arguing with each other which one is best.  Merging both will be difficult as it is confusing in a way that in an artist’s point of view, a picture says more than 1,000 words silently than a video that announces everything in motion and in words. 

If I’m going to have myprivate opinion, using only one piece of equipment for photography and videography should be best kept for the enthusiasts and newbs alike.  Professionals are keener on traditions ; they should be left with what they are trained to do.  A should stick to his SLR, and a videographer stick with his video camera.  In saying this though, the professional wedding videographer is drawn to the Canon 5D SLR purely for its ability to provide wonderful video photographs, typically only seen in 100k and video cameras.  The only downside is, the SLR is primarily built for taking photos and not any thought is given to the ergonomics and functionality for videos.  ( Maybe with its recognition among film makers this will shortly change ).  With the comparisons of differences and likenesses, it is concluded that in this time, it is not sufficient for both parties to merge as a one job description.  Maybe two more years perhaps.

Plan a Wedding Resources

StumbleUpon It!

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

{ 0 comments… add one }

Leave a Comment